Two years ago, when we opened our first photos of the toddlers we were considering adopting, we saw a grinning blond boy with merry eyes and an auburn-haired girl who looked like she was trying not to smile. We noticed that both had smooth skin, clear eyes, and chubby hands. We noticed that the girl K, age three, had her arm protectively around her brother M, age two. And, to our great relief, we noticed toys. On the couch, beside the children, were a toy drum and a large board book. We thought, “These kids have had experience with toys. Unless they’ve got innate cognitive problems, they know how to use their senses, hands, and imagination, and they might even know how to share.”
Some institutionally-raised kids, lacking adequate sensory and social stimulation, fail to meet developmental milestones. When we met K and M, however, we found them as alert, tactile, imaginative, and sociable as all the other children we’d ever met who hadn’t grown up in an orphanage; medical records indicated they were right on schedule. We saw toys in their apartment. Not many, and they had to be shared with six other children, but they were there.
In the early months after we adopted, we found K and M unusually athletic. K could already pump a swing; M could do headstands. Both could outlast even bigger kids in the playground. However, neither kid could play with a toy for more than a couple hours without breaking it. They would jump on balloons, tear books, and dismantle anything with moving parts. My globe-trotting cousin sent hand-me-downs which had survived her three kids and countless baggage handlers; the last toy finally broke eight weeks after we received it. My husband and I observed no anger in the destruction, just curiosity paired with ignorance of how much a toy could take. It was as if our kids hadn’t had enough experience with toys to understand.
We didn’t know what to do, but we felt we had to do something. We didn’t want our kids to break things in school or at other people’s homes. We don’t believe in accumulating too much “stuff,” so we had a number of arguments and did a lot of reading. Eventually, we bought a healthy number of hardy used toys and made it clear to the kids that we wouldn’t replace them if they broke.
I don’t know whether to attribute success to our actions or to the kids’ natural growth, but I’m relieved to say that now, after 20 months home, my daughter and son seem to know what is an appropriate amount of force to use on a toy. They own enough toys to fill a playroom, but no more, and they treat them with respect by putting them away, as well they should: every surviving toy has paid its dues. We like to think our kids have learned about both physics and responsibility.
Imagine my grief when I go to other kids’ houses and see rooms so full of toys that the kids who own them can’t pick out even one to play with. If they can, then they can’t share it, and they never know where to put it away. I can’t help thinking that our kids’ orphan days actually set them up well for functioning in a materialistic society.
Photo graciously provided by Ben McLeod, through a Creative Commons license, some rights reserved.












2 responses so far ↓
AmyL // Aug 19, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Oh, aMEN on kids having too many toys! It’s something that we have to watch so carefully here. One of my boys’ favorite activities is to shop for toys for hours if I’d let them.
One thing that helps limit the influx is having them pay with their own money instead of constantly funding the materialism myself. Also, Hubby is a staunch advocate of regularly culling out anything that’s broken or unused. We just got rid of 5 kitchen sized trash bags of various toys that were clogging up their bedrooms. I actually felt like I could breathe better after we cleared out.
The boys earned $85 selling at a garage sale (a lot of it was “educational toys” that they rarely used so we got good prices for them), and are working to earn another $15 so they can buy two Wii games. I’m thrilled about the swap of two small items for 5 garbage bags.
I’d LOVE to be able to convince relatives to not get them things for Christmas and birthdays that aren’t going to be used. Money would be much better and it takes so much less space! About half of the clutter comes from holiday gifts. The rest I still need to work on, but the idea of one in/one out is appealing.
They definitely play more with toys when there’s less choice. Too much clutter is overwhelming and they’re less likely to care for stuff that way.
Matthew Yack // Aug 20, 2008 at 3:49 pm
I’d LOVE to be a kid again.
Leave a Comment