<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of the Snack Police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/</link>
	<description>Giving New Meaning to Parenting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:52:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slouching Mom</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Slouching Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Private Mom -- I wish I knew the answers.  In theory, private schools DO have more control, because they&#039;re not being monitored by an external agent, right?

	Yep, I&#039;m not a fan of group snacks.  But soon enough, I&#039;ll bet, you will not have to participate in those.  As soon as there&#039;s a kid who&#039;s highly allergic in your daughters&#039;s vicinity, group snack will be a thing of the past, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Private Mom &#8212; I wish I knew the answers.  In theory, private schools DO have more control, because they&#8217;re not being monitored by an external agent, right?</p>
<p>	Yep, I&#8217;m not a fan of group snacks.  But soon enough, I&#8217;ll bet, you will not have to participate in those.  As soon as there&#8217;s a kid who&#8217;s highly allergic in your daughters&#8217;s vicinity, group snack will be a thing of the past, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Mom</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Also, to address what&#039;s been said many times above.....there ARE healthier &#039;kid&#039; snacks out there that DON&quot;T have artificial sweeteners, junk in them.  Go out of the mainstream snack isles, to the healthy food section.  When my daughter wants &#039;junk&#039; food, we give it....just in a different way.  Kashi, Newmans Own, and lots of other brands make products with no high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated oils, artificial sweeteners.  That doesn&#039;t mean that there is no fat or calories in them, just that the products are made with ingredients easier for our bodies to process.

	We don&#039;t tell our daughter, in 1st grade, that we are unhappy with her teachers&#039; choices, just that we feel strongly about her nutritional choices.  Her teacher has suggested that parents bring in healthy snacks for the group snacks, but no one listens.

	How many of your kids have this new &#039;group&#039; snack program?  I think it&#039;s a nightmare!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, to address what&#8217;s been said many times above&#8230;..there ARE healthier &#8216;kid&#8217; snacks out there that DON&#8221;T have artificial sweeteners, junk in them.  Go out of the mainstream snack isles, to the healthy food section.  When my daughter wants &#8216;junk&#8217; food, we give it&#8230;.just in a different way.  Kashi, Newmans Own, and lots of other brands make products with no high fructose corn syrup, partially hydrogenated oils, artificial sweeteners.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that there is no fat or calories in them, just that the products are made with ingredients easier for our bodies to process.</p>
<p>	We don&#8217;t tell our daughter, in 1st grade, that we are unhappy with her teachers&#8217; choices, just that we feel strongly about her nutritional choices.  Her teacher has suggested that parents bring in healthy snacks for the group snacks, but no one listens.</p>
<p>	How many of your kids have this new &#8216;group&#8217; snack program?  I think it&#8217;s a nightmare!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Mom</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Similiar situation...we are being told our daughter has to eat a group snack that is usually unhealthy!  I agree with most, schools don&#039;t have the right to dictate what our kids eat.  When we talked with our daughters&#039; teacher, she stood her ground and told us that our daughter had to eat the unhealthy snacks...out of fairness.  Other kids AND their parents, she said, would be upset if our daughter got to eat a special snack.  This &#039;special&#039; snack is a Kashi brand granola bar or a baggie of veggies/fruit.  We go to a private school, do they have more controlling rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similiar situation&#8230;we are being told our daughter has to eat a group snack that is usually unhealthy!  I agree with most, schools don&#8217;t have the right to dictate what our kids eat.  When we talked with our daughters&#8217; teacher, she stood her ground and told us that our daughter had to eat the unhealthy snacks&#8230;out of fairness.  Other kids AND their parents, she said, would be upset if our daughter got to eat a special snack.  This &#8217;special&#8217; snack is a Kashi brand granola bar or a baggie of veggies/fruit.  We go to a private school, do they have more controlling rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>In the fast lane,

	It is not my intent to say that all rules should be blindly followed.  I agree that a healthy perspective and an unselfish attitude will help guide which battles or rules we will fight in this life.

	They say that evil persists when good men stand by and do nothing.  There are definately rules worth fighting against.  I just think that we need to weigh the pros and cons of a rule and how it effects the masses before we make ripples that we can&#039;t take back.  By evaluating if the rule is in the best interest for the health and safety of the masses we can decide if it is worth fighting for or against.
	The cool thing is that we control our homes and it is there that we make the most difference that is where the individual battles can be fought.
	I really liked your comment about assertiveness and the right to opinion.  I agree that that too is a powerful lesson.  And heaven knows in todays world our kids need that characteristic more than we ever did when growing up.
	I stand corrected in my original statement it was my opinion on snacks not on all rules but I think that that is how we need to approach things one rule at a time each on their individual merits.
	I loved your reply thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fast lane,</p>
<p>	It is not my intent to say that all rules should be blindly followed.  I agree that a healthy perspective and an unselfish attitude will help guide which battles or rules we will fight in this life.</p>
<p>	They say that evil persists when good men stand by and do nothing.  There are definately rules worth fighting against.  I just think that we need to weigh the pros and cons of a rule and how it effects the masses before we make ripples that we can&#8217;t take back.  By evaluating if the rule is in the best interest for the health and safety of the masses we can decide if it is worth fighting for or against.<br />
	The cool thing is that we control our homes and it is there that we make the most difference that is where the individual battles can be fought.<br />
	I really liked your comment about assertiveness and the right to opinion.  I agree that that too is a powerful lesson.  And heaven knows in todays world our kids need that characteristic more than we ever did when growing up.<br />
	I stand corrected in my original statement it was my opinion on snacks not on all rules but I think that that is how we need to approach things one rule at a time each on their individual merits.<br />
	I loved your reply thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InTheFastLane</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>InTheFastLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>I guess I am not enough of a rule follower to believe that just because there is a rule in place, that is has to be is a good rule.  This is a rule that seems to be impinging on personal rights.  This is not like banning smoking where the act of smoking can hurt people who are not smoking.

	I do think that you can also teach your child valuable lessons on being assertive and respectful at the same time.  Stating your opinion does not mean that you are against the school.  You could take it too far, but there is nothing wrong in calling up the principal and politely explaining your position.   If it is done respectfully, then the what you have taught your child is that it is ok to have your own opinion, and it is ok to ask questions and you can still support the school even while you do these things.  As Stacy stated - it is about the attitude.

	As for the snack question: there are ways to get healthy fats and calories into kids without resorting to junk food.  If the snack has sound nutritional value, I do not think it should be disallowed.  Twinkies and Coke on the other hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am not enough of a rule follower to believe that just because there is a rule in place, that is has to be is a good rule.  This is a rule that seems to be impinging on personal rights.  This is not like banning smoking where the act of smoking can hurt people who are not smoking.</p>
<p>	I do think that you can also teach your child valuable lessons on being assertive and respectful at the same time.  Stating your opinion does not mean that you are against the school.  You could take it too far, but there is nothing wrong in calling up the principal and politely explaining your position.   If it is done respectfully, then the what you have taught your child is that it is ok to have your own opinion, and it is ok to ask questions and you can still support the school even while you do these things.  As Stacy stated &#8211; it is about the attitude.</p>
<p>	As for the snack question: there are ways to get healthy fats and calories into kids without resorting to junk food.  If the snack has sound nutritional value, I do not think it should be disallowed.  Twinkies and Coke on the other hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Come on parents think about it for a minute.  Is one meal in the entire day the only time your child can get the fat or sugar necessary.  Can you think beyond yourself for a second and think that while your kid may need a little extra fat or sugar it is not so vital as to hinder the 85% of kids who do not need it.  There are two other meals and dessert in a day.
	You are smart parents to know what your kids need teaching them to be example and obey rules is going to far out weigh what snack they get for lunch.  When your child is 17 he will not remember the snack as much as your attitude toward school rules.  Teach him a rebellious spirit now and you will wish you had just got a little more creative with your snacks.  Unless you agree with the masses that it is an all about &quot;oneself&quot; world and that we are not responsible to anyone.
	GET CREATIVE!!!!  Your kid can be an example and learn a few cooking tricks as well.
	Support your school and your kids will learn a greater lesson than nutrition They&#039;ll learn Leadership, compassion, duty, creativity and service.
	Anger, letters, and tempers only beget the same thing.  Try a different approach.  The rules are meant for the masses and the minority just needs to be a little more creative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on parents think about it for a minute.  Is one meal in the entire day the only time your child can get the fat or sugar necessary.  Can you think beyond yourself for a second and think that while your kid may need a little extra fat or sugar it is not so vital as to hinder the 85% of kids who do not need it.  There are two other meals and dessert in a day.<br />
	You are smart parents to know what your kids need teaching them to be example and obey rules is going to far out weigh what snack they get for lunch.  When your child is 17 he will not remember the snack as much as your attitude toward school rules.  Teach him a rebellious spirit now and you will wish you had just got a little more creative with your snacks.  Unless you agree with the masses that it is an all about &#8220;oneself&#8221; world and that we are not responsible to anyone.<br />
	GET CREATIVE!!!!  Your kid can be an example and learn a few cooking tricks as well.<br />
	Support your school and your kids will learn a greater lesson than nutrition They&#8217;ll learn Leadership, compassion, duty, creativity and service.<br />
	Anger, letters, and tempers only beget the same thing.  Try a different approach.  The rules are meant for the masses and the minority just needs to be a little more creative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>The rule is dumb.  I think the school does have a right to limit what comes in.  There is no reason for potato chips, cookies, apple juice (which has no nutritional value), or soda.  And the school should take a stand on those things because it is hard to get your kids to eat healthy when other kids are eating crap.

	But, the multi-grain, loaded with fruits and veggies (pureed to hide the texture), baked with eggs and whole milk muffins I make to get healthy fats and calories into my picky kid?  I&#039;m tailoring to the individual child, which I thought was kind of the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule is dumb.  I think the school does have a right to limit what comes in.  There is no reason for potato chips, cookies, apple juice (which has no nutritional value), or soda.  And the school should take a stand on those things because it is hard to get your kids to eat healthy when other kids are eating crap.</p>
<p>	But, the multi-grain, loaded with fruits and veggies (pureed to hide the texture), baked with eggs and whole milk muffins I make to get healthy fats and calories into my picky kid?  I&#8217;m tailoring to the individual child, which I thought was kind of the goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanne</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>This kind of regulation makes me fall of my chair with amazement.  I&#039;m Dutch, coming from a country where rules are definitely different than in North America.  I know should take that into account, but still I cannot imagine that a parent is obliged to only give his/her child a certain kind of snack at school. Are there really no exceptions made to this rule? And is it really enforced? What is the teacher supposed to do if a child brings a &#039;forbidden&#039; snack?

	Good luck with it. I hope he&#039;ll get to eat what&#039;s right for him at school asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of regulation makes me fall of my chair with amazement.  I&#8217;m Dutch, coming from a country where rules are definitely different than in North America.  I know should take that into account, but still I cannot imagine that a parent is obliged to only give his/her child a certain kind of snack at school. Are there really no exceptions made to this rule? And is it really enforced? What is the teacher supposed to do if a child brings a &#8216;forbidden&#8217; snack?</p>
<p>	Good luck with it. I hope he&#8217;ll get to eat what&#8217;s right for him at school asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa G.</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>I think banning low-fat and low-sugar snacks is a) totally not the school&#039;s place and b) just dumb.

	Juice (even 100% fruit juice) and fruits are high in natural sugars. Milk and yogurt are high in natural sugars and sometimes fats.

	Snacks that are usually labeled as &quot;low-fat&quot; get that label because the company got sneaky with the serving size (if it&#039;s 0.5 grams of fat per serving, they company can label it as zero grams of fat per serving) or because there&#039;s a lot of high fructose corn syrup or sugar to make up for it.

	I&#039;d rather my kid have a couple full fat, full sugar cookies every now and again than eat those so-called low-fat, low-sugar snacks. Probably healthier for them in more ways than one.

	Oh, and I wouldn&#039;t claim that artificial sweeteners are inherently evil, but they do make many people sick to their stomachs (including me).

	Sorry for the lengthy post. Having gestational diabetes has really gotten me to pay attention to this kind of stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think banning low-fat and low-sugar snacks is a) totally not the school&#8217;s place and b) just dumb.</p>
<p>	Juice (even 100% fruit juice) and fruits are high in natural sugars. Milk and yogurt are high in natural sugars and sometimes fats.</p>
<p>	Snacks that are usually labeled as &#8220;low-fat&#8221; get that label because the company got sneaky with the serving size (if it&#8217;s 0.5 grams of fat per serving, they company can label it as zero grams of fat per serving) or because there&#8217;s a lot of high fructose corn syrup or sugar to make up for it.</p>
<p>	I&#8217;d rather my kid have a couple full fat, full sugar cookies every now and again than eat those so-called low-fat, low-sugar snacks. Probably healthier for them in more ways than one.</p>
<p>	Oh, and I wouldn&#8217;t claim that artificial sweeteners are inherently evil, but they do make many people sick to their stomachs (including me).</p>
<p>	Sorry for the lengthy post. Having gestational diabetes has really gotten me to pay attention to this kind of stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cce</title>
		<link>http://gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>cce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gnmparents.com/beware-of-the-snack-police/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Slouching Mom, afraid I can&#039;t join you in your outrage. I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madmarriage.com/blog/2007/04/27/198/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ranted about this topic before&lt;/a&gt; but on the flip side of the argument. I think it&#039;s an exemplary thing your school district is attempting. While your son may be under weight, the majority of his peers suffer an altogether different fate at the hands of parents who seem to have missed the memo about healthy eating.  I also think the school district is on to something that has to do with behavior problems and the associations between sugar, food coloring, and hyperactivity. Snack food companies do such a good job thinking about convenient, take-to-school packaging for their garbage, that I tempted to say that sending kids to school with junk food has become commonplace simply because it&#039;s just more convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slouching Mom, afraid I can&#8217;t join you in your outrage. I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.madmarriage.com/blog/2007/04/27/198/" rel="nofollow">ranted about this topic before</a> but on the flip side of the argument. I think it&#8217;s an exemplary thing your school district is attempting. While your son may be under weight, the majority of his peers suffer an altogether different fate at the hands of parents who seem to have missed the memo about healthy eating.  I also think the school district is on to something that has to do with behavior problems and the associations between sugar, food coloring, and hyperactivity. Snack food companies do such a good job thinking about convenient, take-to-school packaging for their garbage, that I tempted to say that sending kids to school with junk food has become commonplace simply because it&#8217;s just more convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
